Works in Progress

My research explores the extent to which religion undergirds or undermines democratic support among citizens. More specifically, I have published articles on the relationship between religion and political tolerance among both citizens and clergy, as well as the political implications of the emergent church movement – an offshoot of evangelicalism that has a radical deliberative democratic structure. My future agenda is concerned with better understanding the role that clergy play as political leaders of their congregations, as well as continuing to explore the implications of the emergent church movement among clergy and citizens. I rely on a diversity of observational and experimental research designs and statistical analyses in my work.

Christian Theology and Attitudes Toward Political-Ideological Groups (with George Yancey and Marie Eisenstein)

The purpose of this paper is to examine the influence of Christian theology on feelings or attitudes toward liberal and conservative political-ideological groups.  We know how religious affiliations, behaviors, and beliefs in the United States influence voting behavior, political party affiliation and specific issue attitudes, but we do not fully understand how Christian theology influences one’s favorable / unfavorable attitudes to groups across the ideological spectrum.  Using the 2012 ANES data, we test logit models for favorable / unfavorable scores toward four different groups.  While progressive Christians are linked with liberal political ideology and considered more likely to be tolerant of groups that are different than themselves, our results do not support this contention.  Rather, progressive Christians are more likely to exhibit an unfavorable attitude toward groups with political differences while conservative Christians are not.  On the other hand, conservative Christians are more likely to exhibit an unfavorable attitude toward groups with religious differences while progressive Christians are not.

Manuscript

Forthcoming at the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion

The Use of Social Media by Religious Leaders: Evangelical Leaders and Twitter (with Miles Williams)

Social media is altering how some religious leaders communicate with their followers and with the public. This has the potential to challenge theories of religious communication that have been developed in the study of traditional modes such as sermons. We examine how leaders in U.S. evangelicalism use the public platform provided by Twitter. Using over 85,000 tweets from 88 prominent evangelical leaders, we find that these leaders often use their social media platforms as a natural extension of their current modes of communication. However, our findings also suggest that for some leaders social media may be a medium for political communication. Our analysis provides support for the belief that religious leaders that have gained a following for being politically active use their Twitter accounts to spread their political message in contrast to the clear majority of other leaders in our sample who remain relatively silent on political issues. We conclude with a discussion of how our analysis advances theories of religion and communication.

Manuscript

Revise and Resubmit at the Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

Divine Attribution? The Interaction of Religious and Secular Beliefs on Climate Change Attitudes. (With Paul Djupe and Dan Cox)

Using high quality phone survey data, our findings indicate that there is a lack of stability in core religious beliefs closely tied to environmental attitudes in prior work. We also document that religious predictors fade when beliefs about the changing climate are taken into account.

Manuscript

Revise and Resubmit at American Politics Research

Measuring Evangelicals: Practical Considerations for Social Scientists (with Andrew Lewis)

Evangelical Protestants garner much attention in polling and public opinion research, in large part because they have become an important electoral coalition in conservative politics. Despite this attention, measuring white evangelicals remains elusive and often opaque. This article seeks to provide practical guidance to researchers who want to measure or analyze evangelicals. In the social sciences, many have adopted a detailed religious affiliation approach that categorizes evangelicals based on the religious tradition of the denominations to which they belong. Others have used a simpler self-identification classification scheme, which asks respondents if they consider themselves “born-again or evangelical”, though it is often unclear if these pollsters and researchers limit their evangelical classification to Protestant self-identifiers. While the affiliation and self-identification schemes are predominant, a practical examination of which approach is best for researchers has been absent until now. Using several waves of the General Social Survey and the Cooperative Congressional Election Study, we compare the affiliation and self-identification approaches to classifying evangelicals. We find almost no statistical differences between the two measurements in prominent demographic, political, or religious factors. Thus, we suggest that for most researchers, especially when space and time are important considerations, a simple question about broad religious affiliation followed by a born-again or evangelical self-identification question will suffice.

Manuscript

Under Review

Who’s In Charge? Religious Authority Values in Democratic Society

While there is a great deal of heterogeneity in Christian behavior and practice, one unifying aspect of nearly all religious communities is their organizational structure. While religious authority is an essential part of the religious experience, social scientists have only begun to understand how the relationship between clergy and laity shape congregant’s views of their proper roles in democratic society. Using a sample of Christian clergy, this study develops a measure that operationalizes the concept of religious authority. This measure is then compared with the effect of religious conservatism in the context of a number of important components of democratic society including child rearing values, deliberative values, and democratic norms. The results of this analysis indicate that under some conditions religious authority and religious conservatism behave in a similar way, religious authority values represent a distinct and important measurement of religiosity.

 

Manuscript